I recently was involved in an e-mail debate with a good friend, Herb Rader who I had invited to join my blog. He e-mailed me to say he really like my blog, but when he clicked on the link which says "Next Blog" he got re-routed to a pornographic site. This doesn't always happen as it's a random link, but it does present an ethical issue - Is this something which could potentially expose participants to inappropriate material?
Herb gave me permission to open up our debate on blogger so that we can hear from all of you.
Here's my personal take:
I personally find nothing wrong with blogger. It is what I would call a 'virtual space' - similar to physical space. If anyone were to suggest that we gather all Christians together and put them into a colony in order to keep them safe, I would have to conclude the person was mad - let alone theologically misinformed. Any solid ecclessiology would reject this perspective. I would argue that when we move into the virtual space, a similar approach is needed.
I think that a person's blog is very much like property which is owned by a person. Another helpful metaphor might be the blank canvas. It is what we
put in our houses/canvas/virtual space which is the critical issue.
However, there is one issue which concerns me with these social networking spaces - Many times people will look at Blogger/My Space/Xanga like a personal diary. Often blogs will be written in the privacy of one's room/office/home. Writing in a personal diary and writing on a blog ARE NOT the same thing! It could be likened to photocopying your personal diary and posting it on every billboard in the world! While we write in private spaces, the moment we
publish our posts, these become part of the PUBLIC DOMAIN. That means, anyone can read them.
So why do people blog? Two reasons come to mind:
1.
Agency - Blogs allow for a person to speak their mind. To
say something in a world where it seems so difficult to be heard. This can often take the form of
venting. All that blogs do is AMPLIFY the message being communicated - similar to a megaphone. It is an extension of our voice, and therefore allows for people to feel they have agency - the ability to be a PRODUCER/PUBLISHER in a world which demands we only consume.
Remember the word of Uncle Ben in Spiderman though - "With great power comes great responsibility." As we develop new literacy skills for navigating these new media spaces, people will begin to get what is appropriate and what is not. Always remember, if you post something, Somebody
is going to read it. Sometimes this is a good thing. Other times... not so good!
2.
Collaboration - In media studies, we would say that this communications technology 'implodes space and time.' What I mean is that people being able to connect over ideas speeds up and is not limited to where you live anymore. People who live hundreds of miles apart can be united in seconds. Therefore, they can connect, collaborate, debate etc. without having to leave the actual physical space where they reside. In otherwords, it fosters COMMUNITY.
When it comes to debating issues, it speeds up the possibility of bringing together a critical mass of people who want to do something together. Again, whether this is good or bad all depends upon the people and what they are intending to do. Remember, the medium amplifies and accelerates what already exists in people.
New media often bring about revolutions. Look at the printing press and the rise of protestantism (and the emergence of the modern nation-state - and the development of the individual). Change is inevitable, it is a question of how we respond to it which determines whether we sink or swim.
Blogging isn't going away. Just look at the last elections and you'll see this is true. However, I don't think that this should be reason for Christians to get into their bunkers! This is a changing culture, but this is also reality - and this world (virtual included) is where we are called to live out our callings.
Thoughts anyone on this subject? (Christian and non-Christian alike)